![]() Adobe Media Encoder CS6 vs Catalyst. I'm about to start editing a small business profile video and became curious as to how to render MXF files for Vegas. As a random test I took the exact same video clip and rendered out a 4. MXF file from Catalyst and Adobe Media Encoder CS6. I brought both clips into Vegas Pro 1. I'm noticing is the Adobe Media Encoder clip is slightly flatter compared to the clip rendered from Catalyst. I've attached screen saves from within Vegas to show the differences. Is this normal behavior for Catalyst - It seems to be bumping up my contrast when I'd prefer to do it myself in post. These frame grabs are untouched other than the transcode and imported into Vegas Pro. Adobe Media Encoder CS6 Version (XDCAMHD 5. NTSC 4. 22) - File size: 1. MBSONY Catalyst Version (XAVC- I) - File Size 4. MBAs you can easily see, there is a marked difference in these frame grabs from within Vegas Pro. · Go where the pros know Avid. I have been creating my QuickTime master files as DNxHD 145 RGB files. FYI I'm using Matrox MX02 MAX with Adobe Media Encoder to. Dnxhd Download· In Avid systems there's even a project setting for this. From there I send it to Media Encoder and select MXF OP1a and the rest. ProRes VS DNxHD. The second generation release of the Miraizon DNxHD and ProRes Codecs brings many new features. unless you owned Avid Media. (e.g. in Adobe CS and CC. Any comments/thoughts???
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |